A panicked Arjun Acharya stands mid-pooja, guruji barking “Ab isey kaato, ” and instead of the plant trunk he’s meant to cleave, he bites the sword, and somehow, the image captures everything Bhooth Bangla is: broad, committed, and just a little misshapen. Priyadarshan’s second Hindi horror comedy swings hard in its first half, but by the time Vadhusur’s mythology unravels, the fun has already started leaking out.

Priyadarshan Builds the Right House, Then Loses the Keys
The decision to chase out-and-out horror rather than the psychological maze of Bhool Bhulaiyaa is the right call, and Priyadarshan earns early goodwill with it. His instinct for physical timing is still sharp, and there are sequences here that feel genuinely alive.
But the screenplay, credited to Rohan Shankar, Abilash Nair, and Priyadarshan himself, leans too heavily on mythology borrowed from the Vedas and the Mahabharata without earning its stakes dramatically. The narrative follows a well-worn path, haunted ancestral mansion, reluctant protagonist, escalating chaos, and rarely deviates from it.

The Haunted Mansion Comedy Works Until It Doesn’t
When Bhooth Bangla is firing, it is genuinely raucous. Akshay Kumar, Paresh Rawal, Rajpal Yadav, and Asrani together in a crumbling, demonic property feel like a throwback Priyadarshan knew his audience wanted. The quartet comedy in the first half is the film’s most confident stretch.
The demonic Vadhusur, who abducts and kills newlywed brides, provides genuine menace on paper. But the horror half of this comedy-horror contract is handled unevenly. Scares arrive more as punctuation than as sustained dread, and the horror sequences feel interrupted rather than earned.
The sword-biting gag during the pooja scene is a good example of what the film does best: using the haunted-mansion premise as a pressure cooker for physical comedy, then puncturing the tension with perfectly timed absurdity. I wish the film trusted that instinct throughout its second half rather than pivoting to mythology-heavy exposition.
For more Hindi comedy horror reviews and analysis, the Hindi Horror reviews section has deeper dives worth exploring.

Rawal and Yadav Are Doing the Heavy Lifting in Plain Sight
Paresh Rawal as the wedding planner is exactly as reliable as that casting promises. His physicality is precise, and he anchors the ensemble scenes with the kind of deadpan commitment that keeps broad comedy from tipping into chaos.
Rajpal Yadav’s Balli, oddball nephew, chaos agent, is used well in the first half. His presence signals that the film is unafraid to be silly, which is a braver choice than it sounds in a Priyadarshan horror context. Asrani, in a supporting role, adds texture to the comedy quartet and reminds you how underused he has been for far too long.
The Release Shuffle Was a Red Flag the Film Half-Confirms
Bhooth Bangla shifted release dates four times, from April 2 to May 15 to April 10, finally landing on April 17, a pattern that usually signals producer anxiety rather than polish. According to Sacnilk, the film opened to Rs 4.29 crore India net until 4pm on opening Friday, with Rs 6.23 crore reported by Saturday evening, a start that trade reports categorised as average.
Akshay Kumar’s reported fee of Rs 50 crore, flagged by Filmi Beat though unconfirmed, hangs awkwardly against those numbers. Bhooth Bangla is not a disaster, but it is performing like a film the audience is mildly curious about rather than urgently excited by. That gap between potential and response feels familiar for this franchise’s second chapter.
If you enjoy the Bhool Bhulaiyaa brand of physical comic horror, Bhooth Bangla’s first half earns a watch, go for the quartet scenes, stay cautious about what follows. A theatre with a live crowd that responds to physical comedy would serve this film well; cold, sober viewing at home will magnify every structural flaw.
If Lee Cronin’s approach to blending mythology with horror craft interests you, the Lee Cronin review examines a similar problem of ambition outpacing execution.
Bhooth Bangla earns its laughs early and loses its nerve late, a film that Priyadarshan fans will partially enjoy but not fully defend, and at 2.5 out of 5, it sits exactly where an uneven spookfest deserves to.
Jana Nayagan shares a similar structural collapse in the second half, both films front-load their energy and then buckle, which makes the Jana Nayagan verdict worth reading alongside this one.